Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Res. 2010 Apr;67(4):435–439. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181d0187f

Table 5.

Relationship between 8 common mutation types and scoliosis

Model 1 Model 2

OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
MECP2 R294X Ref Ref
mutation R106W 7.47 (1.43, 38.93) 0.017 3.83 (0.68, 21.59) 0.128
R133C 2.83 (0.69, 11.59) 0.147 4.48 (0.99, 20.10) 0.050
T158M 8.40 (2.73, 25.87) 0.000 5.58 (1.71, 18.27) 0.005
R168X 9.18 (2.83, 29.81) 0.000 6.59 (1.89, 22.92) 0.003
R255X 8.21 (2.61, 25.83) 0.000 5.16 (1.54, 17.30) 0.008
R270X 13.29 (3.64, 48.56) <0.0001 8.28 (2.02, 33.91) 0.003
R306C 2.42 (0.68, 8.66) 0.173 2.11 (0.53, 8.44) 0.290
Motor-behavioral assessment 1.06 (1.03, 1.08) <0.0001
Walking Acquired <18 mo/apraxic gait Ref
Acquired ≥18 mo or lost or never 2.58 (1.16, 5.71) 0.020
Constipation No Ref
Yes 1.30 (0.61, 2.78) 0.500

Model 1, logistic regression model for P (having scoliosis = 1) adjusting for age; model 2, logistic regression model for P (having scoliosis = 1) adjusting for age and significant clinical parameters.