Table 6.
Simulation results with PMFA selecting q (and g) in two set-ups
| q | Set-up 2, Case III |
New set-up |
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
#( , ĝ = g) |
with (ĝ, q) | #( , ĝ = g) |
with (ĝ, q) |
|||||||
| g = 1 | 2 | 3 | RI | aRI | g = 1 | 2 | 3 | RI | aRI | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.690 | 0.389 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.774 | 0.552 |
| 1 | 0 | 17 | 9 | 0.979 | 0.958 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.973 | 0.945 |
| 2 | 0 | 18 | 5 | 0.983 | 0.965 | 0 | 31 | 19 | 0.994 | 0.989 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.970 | 0.939 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.984 | 0.967 |
RI and aRI were calculated with selected ĝ and fixed q.

