Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 24;66(Pt 4):352–357. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909038207

Table 1. Comparison of methods for prokaryal expression of SeMet-labelled protein.

Met auxotroph, B834 Met inhibition, BL21 No Met inhibition, defined LeMaster medium + SeMet, BL21 Auto-induction, BL21
Slow growth, longer lag phase, low cell density Closer to LB levels of growth, good cell density Close to LB levels of growth, good cell density High cell density, ease of culture, good growth; takes a long time (48 h)
Poor yields, ∼20% that of unlabelled OK yields, ∼30–80% that of unlabelled Good yields, ∼50–70% that of unlabelled Good recovery of protein, often better than induced unlabelled
∼100% incorporation of SeMet >90% incorporation of SeMet >90% incorporation of SeMet >90% incorporation of SeMet