Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 22;115(13):2686–2694. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-229740

Table 2.

Effect of missing KIR ligands on transplantation outcome

Group Cohort size Relapse* aGVHD (grades II-IV)* TRM* DFS
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P
AML and MDS 105
    All KIR-L present 38 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 67 0.79 (0.40-1.59) .52 1.56 (0.79-3.08) .20 2.19 (0.61-7.80) .23 0.91 (0.50-1.65) .74
    Missing HLA-C1 14 0.66 (0.20-2.16) .49 1.68 (0.57-4.91) .34 0.26 (0.03-2.43) .24 1.81 (0.66-4.95) .25
    Missing HLA-C2 17 0.73 (0.27-1.96) .53 2.87 (1.29-6.37) .01 4.01 (0.98-16.40) .05 0.68 (0.29-1.57) .36
    Missing HLA-Bw4 9 0.68 (0.14-3.32) .63 0.61 (0.12-3.05) .55 0.29 (0.02-3.74) .36 1.71 (0.53-5.49) .37
    Missing HLA-Bw4 and HLA-C1 or HLA-C2 27 0.90 (0.41-1.95) .78 1.26 (0.51-3.12) .62 0.43 (0.15-1.24) .12 0.66 (0.32-1.36) .25
AML 81
    All KIR-L present 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 53 0.91 (0.40-2.08) .84 1.52 (0.65-3.57) .33 1.05 (0.26-4.17) .94 0.91 (0.45-1.86) .80
MDS 24
    All KIR-L present 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 14 0.38 (0.10-1.45) .15 1.80 (0.59-5.51) .30 3.57 (0.71-17.9) .08 0.80 (0.27-2.40) .69
Subgroups of AML and MDS
    Patient with ATG treatment 23
    All KIR-L present 12 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 11 1.11 (0.34-3.58) .86 0.36 (0.04-3.35) .37 1.14 (0.08-16.05) .92 1.00 (0.25-4.03) 1.00
    Patient without ATG treatment 82
    All KIR-L present 26 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 56 0.78 (0.33-1.84) .57 1.63 (0.76-3.51) .22 2.41 (0.52-11.12) .26 0.86 (0.42-1.77) .69
    Patient receiving BM grafts 35
    All KIR-L present 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 25 0.51 (0.21-1.25) .14 1.15 (0.32-4.11) .83 2.01 (0.23-17.39) .52 1.45 (0.57-3.68) .43
    Patient receiving PBSC grafts 70
    All KIR-L present 28 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 42 1.17 (0.43-3.19) .76 1.67 (0.75-3.72) .21 2.23 (0.46-10.68) .32 0.71 (0.31-1.59) .40
    Patient with MAC 76
    All KIR-L present 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 54 0.68 (0.29-1.59) .38 1.32 (0.62-2.84) .48 2.14 (0.46-9.86) .33 0.98 (0.47-2.06) .97
    Patient with RIC 29
    All KIR-L present 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
    Missing 1 or more KIR-L 13 1.31 (0.40-4.25) .66 0.81 (0.15-4.46) .81 1.31 (0.09-18.83) .84 0.74 (0.23-2.34) .61

KIR-L indicates KIR ligand; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cell; and MAC, myeloablative conditioning.

*

Values obtained by proportional subdistribution hazard regression model of Fine and Gray in a competing risks setting. Competing events were relapse (for TRM), death without aGVHD within 100 days after the transplantation (for aGVHD), and death without relapse (for relapse).

Hazard ratio and confidence interval (CI) obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method, P values by log-rank test.

Values obtained by the Mantel-Haenszel method, P values by log-rank test via GraphPad Prism software. (Fine and Gray analysis could not be used due to zero events in one of the groups.)