Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 11.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Dis. 2005;22:9–23. doi: 10.3233/bd-2006-22103

Table 3.

Percent frequency distribution of IBC cases compared to all breast cancer cases for each SEER Tumor Registry, during the years 1992 to 2002

SEER Registry All breast cancer cases Comprehensive IBC


n Rate Count (n) % of total breast cases Rate RR 95% CI
Los Angeles 57,161 124.821 1,401 2.45% 3.042 1.00 LL UL
Rural Georgia 763 2.979 21 2.75% 2.979 0.98 0.60 1.52
Atlanta (Metropolitan) 17,050 133.937 372 2.18% 2.844 0.93 0.83 1.05
Utah 10,228 115.758 233 2.28% 2.622 0.86 0.75 0.99
Iowa 24,216 129.963 459 1.90% 2.547 0.84 0.75 0.93
New Mexico 10,993 115.665 229 2.08% 2.419 0.80 0.69 0.92
Seattle (Puget Sound) 31,048 146.153 512 1.65% 2.413 0.79 0.72 0.88
San Francisco-Oakland 32,070 139.585 549 1.71% 2.392 0.79 0.71 0.87
Hawaii 8,565 126.277 148 1.73% 2.192 0.72 0.60 0.86
Detroit (Metropolitan) 31,934 134.413 515 1.61% 2.19 0.72 0.65 0.80
Alaska Natives 444 124.031 10 2.25% 2.183 0.72 0.33 1.55
Connecticut 30,128 141.093 449 1.49% 2.12 0.70 0.62 0.78
San Jose-Monterey 15,524 135.755 239 1.54% 2.064 0.68 0.59 0.78
All SEER Registries 270,124 132.429 5,137 1.90% 2.120 0.70 0.62 0.78

Key: n, sample size; Comprehensive IBC (i.e., IBC=ICD-O 8530 or EOD-E 70 or EOD-S 998); Rate, age-adjusted incidence rate expressed per 100,000 woman-years: RR, rate ratio where the rate for a given registry is compared to the Los Angeles Tumor Registry with an assigned RR of 1.00; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals with lower and upper limits (LL and UL); ∼, not calculated.