Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2010 Mar;24(2):222–243. doi: 10.1037/a0017619

Table 6.

Fit statistics and correlations for structural equation models including working memory capacity or executive function as mediators of the relation between age and episodic memory. EM: Episodic Memory; WMC: Working Memory Capacity; EF: Executive Function; EA: Executive Attention; PS: Processing Speed

Model Correlation χ2 df CFI RMSEA
Age Effect Model 1.0 2 1.0 0.00
 Age → EM -.41
Model A1 41.8 18 .95 .081
 Age → WMC -.58
 Age → EM .01
 WMC → EM .73
Model A2 90.4 18 .83 .141
 Age → EF -.54
 Age → EM -.01
 EF → EM .73
Model A3 168.4 52 .86 .106
 Age → EA -.61
 Age → EM .05
 EA → EM .77
Model B1 70.8 41 .97 .062
 Age → PS -.81
 PS → WMC .75
 PS → EM -.08
 Age → EM -.04
 WMC → EM .78
Model B2 135.3 50 .92 .092
 Age → PS -.81
 PS → EF .78
 PS → EM -.25
 Age → EM -.08
 EF → EM .90
Model B3 212.6 .86 .91 .086
 Age → PS -.81
 PS → EA .78
 PS → EM -.19
 Age → EM -.04
 EA → EM .86