Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 30;298(4):F962–F972. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00250.2009

Table 1.

Simulation 1: CD inflow concentrations and resulting urine flow and content

Urine
CD Inflow*
Flow rate
Stage Na+, mM Urea, mM nl/min ml/day Total osmolality, mosmol/kgH2O Na+, mM Urea, mM NaCl+Urea, mosmol/kgH2O
1 0.0 750.8 0.0581 6.36 2,075 116.1 1,605 1,770
2 39.58 675.7 0.0492 5.38 2,094 129.6 1,543 1,736
3 79.16 600.7 0.0447 4.89 2,031 141.2 1,419 1,636
4 118.7 525.6 0.0451 4.94 1,881 156.0 1,239 1,489
5 158.3 450.5 0.0524 5.73 1,655 181.7 1,013 1,317
6 197.9 375.4 0.0681 7.45 1,404 215.0 772 1,144
7 237.5 300.3 0.0907 9.93 1,186 246.4 554.0 990.8
8 277.1 225.2 0.117 12.8 1,018 273.5 375.7 867.7
9 316.7 150.2 0.145 15.9 893.3 279.3 231.3 738.3
10 356.2 75.08 0.173 18.9 798.3 319.4 111.5 695.9
11 395.8 0.0 0.199 21.8 725.5 341.1 9.2 636.5
*

At each stage, nonreabsorbable (NR) solute is present in collecting duct (CD) inflow at a concentration of 20 mM.

Urine flow rate is given in nl·min−1·nephron−1 and in ml·day−1·animal−1.

Although a 0 NaCl content is likely unphysiological, this inflow condition is provided for comparison with the other stages.