Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 30;298(4):F962–F972. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00250.2009

Table 4.

Simulation 3: CD inflow concentrations and resulting urine flow and content

Urine
CD Inflow*
Flow rate
Stage Na+, mM Urea, mM nl/min ml/day Total osmolality, mosmol/kgH2O Na+, mM Urea, mM NaCl+Urea, mosmol/kgH2O
1 356.2 75.08 0.173 18.9 794.5 318.8 109.1 692.4
2 347.6 129.0 0.167 18.3 890.3 321.4 190.5 776.2
3 339.0 182.9 0.161 17.6 995.0 324.1 279.1 867.1
4 330.3 236.8 0.155 17.0 1,107 326.3 375.4 964.5
5 321.7 290.7 0.149 16.3 1,227 327.6 479.5 1,068
6 313.1 344.6 0.143 15.6 1,354 327.8 591.8 1,177
7 304.5 398.5 0.138 15.1 1,489 327.0 712.5 1,293
8 295.9 452.4 0.133 14.6 1,632 324.9 841.9 1,414
9 287.2 506.3 0.128 14.0 1,782 321.6 980.0 1,542
10 278.6 560.2 0.124 13.6 1,940 317.0 1,127 1,676
11 270.0 614.1 0.119 13.0 2,104 311.0 1,283 1,817
*

At stage 1, NR solute was present in CD inflow at a concentration of 20 mM and total CD inflow osmolality was 765.7 mosmol/kgH2O. In each successive stage, NR solute concentration was increased by 1 mM. Thus at stage 11, NR solute concentration is 30 mM, and total osmolality was 1,148 mosmol/kgH2O.

Urine flow rate is given in nl·min−1·nephron−1 and in ml·day−1·animal−1.