Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 10;65B(3):358–369. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp118

Table 3.

Resident Perceptions of Relationships with Coresidents

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Resident characteristics
    Female 10.759** (3.334) 8.890** (3.368) 8.807** (3.346) 8.238* (3.346)
    Never married or divorceda −4.563 (5.102) −2.860 (5.471) −2.390 (5.387) −1.718 (5.122)
    Widoweda 4.050 (4.407) 3.857 (4.755) 4.397 (4.650) 4.539 (4.496)
    Physical function 4.963** (1.411) 4.452** (1.325) 4.486** (1.352) 4.359** (1.378)
Facility characteristics
    Facility size −0.049* (0.022) −0.050* (0.020) −0.051* (0.021) −0.053* (0.021)
    Behavioral ALFb −3.496 (6.843) 3.154 (6.568) 3.780 (7.021) 6.383 (7.207)
    High-frailty ALFb −2.398 (3.458) −2.345 (2.976) −1.592 (3.127) −1.457 (3.187)
Advantage and choice
    Private payc 0.307 (3.714) 0.492 (3.387) 7.209 (7.654)
    Control over moved 7.459* (3.591) 4.719 (3.250) 11.496† (6.761)
External social support
    Family contact 4.057** (1.432) 3.806** (1.406) 7.071** (2.316)
    Friend contact 8.333* (3.189) 7.889* (3.099) 8.146* (3.142)
    Private Pay × Family −2.477 (2.516)
    Control × Family −2.892 (2.404)
    Constant 60.297** (6.440) 51.252** (6.543) 47.882** (7.386) 40.168** (8.322)
Observations 429 429 429 429
R2 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.15

Notes: ALF = assisted living facility.

a

Reference category is married.

b

Reference category is traditional ALF.

c

Reference category is all other sources of payment besides private funds and long-term care insurance.

d

Reference category is little or no control over the move to AL.

**p < .01; *p < .05; †p < .10.