Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Resuscitation. 2009 Oct 8;80(12):1382–1387. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.019

Table Four.

Attitudes towards consent concepts in general and associated respondent characteristics

Concept Supports* Does not support* Has no opinion*
Surrogate Consent
is acceptable
if the patient cannot give
consent
78% of total
Higher education
(<.0001)
11% of total
Non- white (.0230)
Older (<.0001)
11% of total
Older (.0191)
Less education
(<.0001)
Surrogate Consent
acceptable even if
the research study
offers no direct
benefit to the patient
65%
Higher income
(.0275)
Younger (.0025)
More education
(.0032)
Know of someone
with seizures
(.0876)
19.3%
Women (.0078)
Non white (.0109)
15.6%
Older ( .0457)
Less education
(<.0001)
EFIC is acceptable
for patient
enrollment into an
emergency research
study when no
surrogate is
available to speak
for the patient
35.4%
Higher incomes
(.0136)
Knows someone
with seizures
( .0287)
46.5%
Women(.0758)
18.0%
Less education
( .0067)
Lower income
( .0056)
EFIC is acceptable
even if the research
study offers no
direct benefit to the
patient
38.1%
No characteristics
statistically
significant
38.1%
Older (.0573)
More education
(.0901)
23.4%
Less education
(.0035)
Lower income
(.0002)
EFIC enrollment is
acceptable for
myself if no
surrogates are
available to speak
for me
51%
Previous
participation in
research (.0483)
Knew someone with
seizures (.0028)
31.3%
Women (.0692)
17.6%
Lower income
( .0400)
Less education
( <.0001)
Older (.0695)
EFIC enrollment is
acceptable for me
even if the study
offers no direct benefit
46%
Higher income
(.0704)
34.4%
Women (.0704)
19.2%
Less education
(<.0001)
Lower income
(.0879)
*

numbers in parentheses are p values; % do not always add up to 100 due to rounding