Table 1.
Variables | Males | Females | Pa |
---|---|---|---|
n | 675 | 575 | |
Age (yr) | 16.5 ± 2.0 | 16.7 ± 2.1 | 0.197 |
Weight (kg) | 48.6 ± 8.1 | 46.3 ± 6.7 | <0.0001 |
Height (cm) | 160.7 ± 7.8 | 152.5 ± 5.3 | <0.0001 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 18.7 ± 2.2 | 19.9 ± 2.5 | <0.0001 |
BMI Z-scoreb | −0.04 ± 0.98 | −0.04 ± 1.01 | 0.476 |
Body composition (kg) | |||
FM | 5.8 ± 3.5 | 12.9 ± 4.3 | <0.0001 |
LM | 41.3 ± 6.5 | 31.6 ± 3.2 | <0.0001 |
Adiponectin (μg/ml) | 19.0 ± 10.9 | 22.4 ± 12.5 | <0.0001 |
ln(Adiponectin) | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 2.9 ± 0.6 | <0.0001 |
Leptin (pg/ml) | 2059.7 ± 2421.1 | 8388.9 ± 5551.6 | <0.0001 |
ln(Leptin) | 7.3 ± 0.7 | 8.8 ± 0.7 | <0.0001 |
BMC (g) | |||
WB | 1498.9 ± 350.2 | 1324.2 ± 233.6 | <0.0001 |
Lumbar spine | 36.8 ± 9.8 | 35.6 ± 6.8 | <0.0001 |
TH | 28.3 ± 5.7 | 23.9 ± 3.5 | <0.0001 |
BA (cm2) | |||
WB | 1658.3 ± 244.1 | 1521.1 ± 181.2 | <0.0001 |
Lumbar spine | 38.9 ± 5.7 | 35.8 ± 3.9 | <0.0001 |
TH | 31.0 ± 3.3 | 27.0 ± 2.0 | <0.0001 |
Hip geometric indices | |||
CSA (cm2) | 1.36 ± 0.25 | 1.17 ± 0.16 | <0.0001 |
SM (cm3) | 0.55 ± 0.14 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | <0.0001 |
Tanner stage | |||
I | 60 (8.9) | 8 (1.4) | |
II | 110 (16.3) | 91 (15.8) | |
III | 132 (19.5) | 215 (37.4) | |
IV | 143 (21.2) | 149 (25.9) | |
V | 133 (19.7) | 104 (18.1) | |
Unknown | 97 (14.4) | 8 (1.4) | <0.0001 |
Menarche status | |||
No | 66 (11.5) | ||
Menarche at ≤13 yr | 214 (37.3) | ||
Menarche at 14 yr | 150 (26.1) | ||
Menarche at ≥15 yr | 145 (25.2) | ||
Physical activity | |||
Low | 209 (31.0) | 226 (39.3) | |
Moderate | 237 (35.1) | 192 (33.4) | |
Heavy | 158 (23.4) | 95 (16.5) | |
Unknown | 71 (10.5) | 62 (10.8) | 0.003 |
Student (yes) | 502 (74.4) | 374 (65.0) | 0.0003 |
Passive smoking (yes) | 476 (72.8) | 374 (68.6) | 0.105 |
Current smoking (yes) | 64 (9.5) | 0 | <0.0001 |
Mean ± sd is shown for continuous variables, and number (percentage) is shown for categorical variables.
t test and χ2 test were performed to compare gender difference in continuous variables and categorical variables, respectively.
Using the subset of our samples, which was composed of unrelated subjects drawn randomly from each twin pair, as the reference group.