Table 2.
A. Summary of four prediction models (n = 54) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Median (range) | Kattan nomogram | |||
GEMCaP score | ||||
Fixed | Floating | Integrated | ||
Controls | 14% (0%-50%) | 21% (0%-74%) | 16% (3%-66%) | 93% (40%-99%) |
Cases | 18% (3%-46%) | 29% (0%-77%) | 23% (3%-64%) | 53% (3%-96%) |
B. Agreement in classification between GEMCaP and the nomogram | ||||
Agreement in classification* | ||||
%Favorable | % Unfavorable | % Total | ||
Nomogram and: | ||||
Fixed threshold | 52% | 9% | 61% | |
Floating threshold | 28% | 17% | 45% | |
Integrated threshold | 37% | 13% | 50% | |
All three GEMCaP models | 26% | 9% | 35% |
Favorable is defined as a GEMCaP score of <20% and as a nomogram probability of ≥40%.