Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Feb 12;188(2):195–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.02.007

Figure 5. The effect of pulsed flow is odor concentration-dependent.

Figure 5

PI of flies trained by pulsed or constant flow in various odor concentrations. Pulsed flow gave higher scores than constant flow in a limited range of odor concentration. Constant flow did not give average-PI above 60 with odor concentrations we tested. PI was measured 3 min after training. Odor concentrations in the training and the test are indicated. Data are presented as mean ±SEM. n=6, **p< 0.01. t-test. Note that odor concentrations of MCH and OCT were adjusted so that naïve flies are evenly distributed in the T-maze.