Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 3;118(3):375–381. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901423

Table 3.

RRs considering certainty of in utero and early-life exposures in uterine fibroid associations among non-Hispanic whites, 35–59 years of age, in the Sister Study, 2003–2007.a

Definite
Probable
Exposure n No. of cases aRRb 95% CI n No. of cases aRRb 95% CI
Worked and lived on farmc 970 80 1.02 0.82–1.27 618 52 1.04 0.79–1.35
Smoking during pregnancy 5,040 368 0.97 0.87–1.10 1,853 161 1.14 0.97–1.34
DES use 404 31 1.04 0.74–1.46 239 37 2.07 1.53–2.80
Prepregnancy diabetes 29 5 2.26 1.02–5.01 35 5 1.88 0.83–4.23
Gestational diabetesd 50 2 0.60 0.15–2.33 51 7 1.88 0.94–3.74
Preeclampsia/eclampsia 248 22 1.15 0.77–1.72 142 14 1.28 0.78–2.11
Pregnancy-related hypertensione 115 11 1.30 0.74–2.28 128 9 0.96 0.51–1.80
Fed breast milk 6,356 462 0.92 0.83–1.03 811 64 0.99 0.77–1.26
Fed soy formula 481 46 1.32 1.00–1.75 160 12 1.03 0.60–1.78

aRR, adjusted risk ratio.

a

Fibroids status based on self-report of diagnosis at ≤ 35 years of age, excluding 89 women missing fibroid status or age at diagnosis or who reported childhood or adolescent ages at diagnosis (< 15 years).

b

Each model included the following covariates: participant’s age and education, maternal age, firstborn status, and childhood family income (n = 19,531). The reference group is women who reported probably not or definitely not for each exposure.

c

Excludes from the reference group those reporting mothers who worked or lived on a farm (but not both) during pregnancy (n = 949).

d

Excludes those reporting mothers who definitely or probably had diabetes before pregnancy.

e

Excludes those reporting mothers who definitely or probably had preeclampsia during pregnancy.