Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 10;91(5):1324–1335. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28908

TABLE 2.

Percentages of persons in the lowest and highest quantile for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], who were classified into specific latitude regions or quintiles of surrogate markers for vitamin D exposure: sample from the nested case-control studies of the Women's Health Initiative Calcium plus Vitamin D Clinical Trial at enrollment (n = 3055)1

Agreement Subjects2
n (%)
Latitude of clinic center3
 Lowest tertile of serum 25(OH)D (n = 1018)
  Northern (>40°N) Good 498 (48.9)
  Northern and Middle (>37°N) Moderate 720 (70.7)
  Southern (≤37°N) Poor 298 (29.3)
 Highest tertile of serum 25(OH)D (n = 1018)
  Southern (≤37°N) Good 326 (32.0)
  Southern and Middle (≤40°N) Moderate 548 (53.8)
  Northern (>40°N) Poor 470 (46.2)
Langleys [(g-cal)/cm2]3
 Lowest quintile of serum 25(OH)D (n = 611)
  Lowest quintile (300–325) Good 179 (29.3)
  Lowest 2 quintiles (300–350) Moderate 327 (53.5)
  Highest quintile (475–500) Poor 95 (15.6)
 Highest quintile of serum 25(OH)D (n = 611)
  Highest quintile (475–500) Good 152 (24.9)
  Highest 2 quintiles (400–500) Moderate 244 (39.9)
  Lowest quintile (300–325) Poor 184 (30.1)
Watts [(J/s)/m2]4
 Lowest quintile of serum 25(OH)D (n = 611)
  Lowest quintile (0.4–0.5) Good 158 (25.9)
  Lowest 2 quintiles (0.4–0.7) Moderate 287 (47.0)
  Highest quintile (1.5–1.9) Poor 70 (11.5)
 Highest quintile of serum 25(OH)D (n = 611)
  Highest quintile (1.5–1.9) Good 84 (13.8)
  Highest 2 quintiles (1.4–1.9) Moderate 236 (38.6)
  Lowest quintile (0.4–0.5) Poor 129 (21.1)
Total vitamin D, energy-adjusted (μg/d)5
 Lowest quintile of serum 25(OH)D (n = 566)6
  Lowest quintile (0.09–3.10) Good 229 (40.5)
  Lowest 2 quintiles (0.09–5.28) Moderate 364 (64.3)
  Highest quintile (14.96–78.77) Poor 40 (7.1)
 Highest quintile of serum 25(OH)D (n = 585)6
  Highest quintile (14.96–78.77) Good 174 (29.7)
  Highest 2 quintile (>10.40–78.77) Moderate 301 (51.5)
  Lowest quintile (0.09–3.10) Poor 76 (13.0)
1

Serum vitamin D was adjusted for month of blood draw by regressing 25(OH)D on month of blood draw to compute residuals and adding the residuals to the mean serum 25(OH)D concentration in the sample. A weighted κ statistic, obtained by using the Cicchetti-Allison method for computing weights, was computed to compare the agreement (beyond chance) between quantiles of 25(OH)D and the surrogate measures for vitamin D status (38).

2

Percentage equals n/total n.

3

Weighted κ = 0.02

4

Weighted κ = 0.03

5

Weighted κ = 0.19

6

Of 3055 participants, 190 were missing data on total vitamin D intake.