Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 20;31(4):243–251. doi: 10.1159/000165362

Table 4.

Design features, and observed and directly standardized prevalence estimates for studies of the prevalence of dementia from Latin America

Study, setting Reference Sample size of those aged ≥65 Screening procedure Screen negatives sampled in phase 2? Dementia criterion Dementia preva-lence (≥65), %
Dementia prevalence (≥70), %
observed directly standardized to the sample or the current Cuban study observed directly standardized to the sample for the current Cuban study
Cuba, Havana and Matanzas current study 2,944 (2,184) 1 phase n/a DSM-IV 6.4 6.4 8.1 8.1
Previous studies
Chile, Concepcion Albala et al. 1997 [11] 2,449 MMSE <22 yes, 2% DSM-III-R 6.0a
Chile (rural) 2,240 PFAQ >5 5.5a
Venezuela, Maracaibo Molero et al. 2007 [7] 1,364 (941) 1 phase n/a CDR ≥1 13.3 14.8b,c 17.2d 18.6b,c
Brazil, Cantanduva Herrera et al. 2002 [5] 1,656 (1,042) MMSE (education-specific cutpoints) no DSM-IV 7.1 9.5e 10.4 12.3e
PFAQ >5

Brazil, São Paulo Scazufca et al. 2008 [6] 2,072 (1,183) 1 phase n/a DSM-IV 5.1 7.2b 7.2 8.9b
Colombia, 5 regions Pradilla et al. 2003 [8] data not provided WHO screen and MMSE no DSM-IV 3.0a
Uruguay, Villa del Cerro Ketzoian et al. 1997 [9] data not provided ‘suspected dementia’ (method not specified) no not specified - - 70–79 years: 2.7f 5.2b
≥80 years: 9.6f
Cuba, Marianao Llibre et al. 1997 [10] 619 (409) 1 phasea n/a DSM-III-R 10.0 11.5b 14.4a 15.1b

Figures in parentheses represent results for the participants aged ≥70 years. PFAQ = Pfeffer Functional Activities Questionnaire.

a

No further breakdown of prevalence by age or gender within this broad age group, therefore standardization was not possible.

b

Standardized for age and gender.

c

The prevalence of dementia according to the same criterion (CDR >1) in the current Cuban study was 9.8% for those aged ≥65 and 11.7% for those aged ≥70.

d

Unpublished data, provided by the authors.

e

Standardized for age only.

f

The age-specific prevalence was estimated from a bar chart, as no numbers are provided in paper. Also, denominators were not provided, hence it was not possible to aggregate the observed prevalence across these age groups.