Table 3.
Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of HIV test acceptance by latent constructs
| No. | Tested (%) | Odds ratiounadjb (95% CI) | p-value | Odds ratioadjb,c (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 298a | 60% | -- | -- | ||
| HIV coping self efficacy (SE) | ||||||
| Low coping SE | 126 | 52% | referent | |||
| High coping SE | 156 | 69% | 2.05 (1.43–2.93) | .000** | 1.86 (1.24–2.78) | .003** |
| External HIV stigma | ||||||
| High stigma | 136 | 61% | referent | |||
| Low stigma | 141 | 62% | 1.03 (0.67–1.59) | .898 | -- | -- |
| Internal HIV stigma | ||||||
| High stigma | 144 | 59% | referent | |||
| Low stigma | 144 | 61% | 1.09 (.084–1.41) | .511 | -- | -- |
| HIV testing stigma | ||||||
| High stigma | 150 | 56% | referent | |||
| Low stigma | 129 | 68% | 1.69 (1.17–2.44) | .006** | 1.71 (1.05–2.79) | .032* |
| Perceived Risk for HIV | ||||||
| No risk | 235 | 58% | referent | |||
| Some risk | 55 | 73% | 1.94 (1.27–2.97) | .002** | 2.51 (1.57–4.01) | .000** |
| Social Support | 293 | 61% | 1.11 (0.83–1.49) | .466 | -- | -- |
| HIV knowledge | ||||||
| Low knowledge | 153 | 58% | referent | |||
| High knowledge | 145 | 63% | 1.21 (0.92–1.60) | .175 | -- | -- |
a
Numbers do not always add to 298 due to missing data.
b
Standard errors corrected to control for the clustering effect of section.
c
Adjusted model includes variables significant at P value <.05 in bivariate analysis with dependent variable, HIV test acceptance. Interview method was also used as a control variable. N = 261.
*
P value < .05
**
P value < .01