Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biol. 2010 Mar 17;398(2):248–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.03.003

Table 1.

ComAC NMR and refinement statistics.

NMR distance and dihedral constraints ComAC dimera
Distance constraints
 Total NOE 3,639
 Intramolecular 3,150 (~87%)b
 Intermolecular 489 (~13%)b
 Unambiguous 2,316
 Intraresidue 700
 Sequential (|i – j| = 1) 791
 Medium range (|i – j| <4) 1050
 Long range (|i – j| >5) 1098
 Ambiguous 1323
 Hydrogen bonds 103
 Total dihedral angle restraints
  ϕ 172
  ψ 172
Structure statistics
 Energies (kcal mol−1)
  van der Waals −1416 ± −9
  Electrostatic −5325 ± −98
 Average violations per structure
  NOEs and/or hydrogen bonds 0
  Dihedrals 0
 Violations (mean and S.D.)
  Distance constraints (Å) 0.035 ± 0.005
  Hydrogen bonds (Å) 0.054 ± 0.002
  Dihedral angle constraints (degrees) 0.672 ± 0.024
 Deviations from idealized geometry
  Bond lengths (Å) 0.00470 ± 0.00007
  Bond angles (degrees) 0.615 ± 0.008
  Impropers (degrees) 1.60 ± 0.04
 Average pairwise r.m.s.d.c (Å)
  Secondary structure (backbone) 0.20 ± 0.04
  Secondary structure (heavy) 0.56 ± 0.06
  Backbone 0.39 ± 0.11
  Heavy 0.90 ± 0.06
 Ramachandran analysis
  Most favored 84.2%
  Additional allowed 10.3%
  Generously allowed 5.4%
  Disallowed 0.1%
a

Statistics for all dimer residues

b

Percentage of total NOE’s

c

Pairwise r.m.s.d. was calculated among the 10 lowest energy refined structures.