Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 23;102(8):1294–1299. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605625

Table 3. Survival analysis.

Model HR (95% CI) P ER status interaction P a ER status heterogeneity P b
All-cause mortality
Co-dominant
  All tumours (unadjusted) 1.02 (0.88–1.19) 0.78    
  All tumours (adjusted)c 1.01 (0.81–1.25) 0.95    
   ER+ tumours onlyd 1.17 (0.82–1.66) 0.39    
   ER− tumours onlyd 0.94 (0.71–1.24) 0.66 0.74 0.34
           
AG/GG vs AA
  All tumours (unadjusted) 0.92 (0.74–1.15) 0.74    
  All tumours (adjusted)c 0.83 (0.61–1.13) 0.24    
   ER+ tumours onlyd 0.80 (0.50–1.28) 0.36    
   ER− tumours onlyd 0.87 (0.57–1.32) 0.52 0.54 0.80
           
Breast-cancer-specific mortality
Co-dominant
  All tumours (unadjusted) 1.03 (0.87–1.22) 0.72    
  All tumours (adjusted)c 1.02 (0.81–1.28) 0.89    
   ER+ tumours onlyd 1.07 (0.72–1.59) 0.75    
   ER− tumours onlyd 1.02 (0.77–1.37) 0.87 0.72 0.87
           
AG/GG vs AA
  All tumours, unadjusted 0.92 (0.73–1.16) 0.47    
  All tumours (adjusted)c 0.84 (0.60–1.18) 0.33    
   ER+ tumours onlyd 0.75 (0.44–1.25) 0.27    
   ER− tumours onlyd 0.96 (0.61–1.50) 0.84 0.31 0.48

Abbreviation: CI=confidence interval; ER=oestrogen receptor; HR=hazards ratio.

HRs, 95% CIs and P-values under co-dominant and dominant C1qA rs172378 genotype models for all-cause and breast-cancer-specific mortality.

a

Formal test for interaction (effect beyond additive) between C1qA genotype and ER status.

b

One degree of freedom χ2-test for heterogeneity between ER+/− tumor HRs.

c

Models adjusted for age at diagnosis (<40, 40–49, 50–59, 60+), TNM stage, histopathological grade and stratified by ER status.

d

Models adjusted for age at diagnosis (<40, 40–49, 50–59, 60+), TNM stage, histopathological grade.