Skip to main content
. 2010 May;69(5):529–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03637.x

Table 3.

Correlates between ADR reporting rates and PCT variables

PCT variable ADR reports per million population* ADR reports per million population (square root +2 transform) for ‘top drugs’
Prescriptions per thousand population rs=−0.413, P < 0.05 95% CI −0.673, −0.062 r=−0.420, P < 0.05 95% CI −0.678, −0.071
Percentage of male GPs within PCT rs=−0.482, P < 0.01 95% CI −0.717, −0.147 r=−0.50, P < 0.01 95% CI −0.729, −0.171
Percentage of single handed practitioners rs=−0.734, P < 0.001 95% CI −0.865, −0.508 r=−0.663, P < 0.001 95% CI −0.826, −0.398
Average list size rs=−0.519, P= 0.003 95% CI −0.741, −0.196 r=−0.434, P < 0.05 95% CI −0.687, −0.088
Proportion of GPs over 55 years of age (square root transform) rs=−0.566, P < 0.01 95% CI −0.769, −0.258 r=−0.485, P < 0.01 95% CI −0.720, −0.151
Average total QOF points rs= 0.484, P < 0.01 95% CI 0.150, 0.719 r= 0.491, P < 0.01 95% CI 0.158, 0.723
Overall deprivation score* rs=−0.550, P < 0.01 95% CI −0.760, −0.236 rs=−0.570, P < 0.01 95% CI −0.769, −0.258
Proportion of population over 65 years of age* rs= 0.147, P= 0.438 95% CI −0.225, 0.482 rs= 0.128, P= 0.502 95% CI −0.244, 0.466
*

Non-parametric rs= Spearman's ranking correlation (rs), two tailed. r= Pearson's correlation (r), two tailed.