Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010 Jan;39(1):103–116. doi: 10.1080/15374410903401153

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics and ANOVA Results for Sex and Age Differences in the Major Study Variables

Sex effects Age effects

Variable M SD F-value/Partial η2 Sex differences F-value/Partial η2 Age differences
Context of exposure to conflict/violence
 Political 1.07 .37 F = 62.69**/η2 = .10 B > G F = 29.90/η2 = .09 14>11>8
 Community .78 .58 F = 13.16**/η2 = .02 B > G F = 12.23**/η2 = .04 14>11 & 8; 8=11
 School 2.31 .76 F = 37.20**/η2 = .06 B > G F = 5.74*/η2 = .02 14>8; 8=11; 11=14
 Family 1.34 1.15 F = .62/η2 = .00 F = 6.38*/η2 = .02 14>8; 8= 11; 11=14
Aggression (composite)a .00 .01 F = 28.36**/η2 = .05 B > G F = 19.71**/η2 = .06 11=14>8
Post-traumatic stress 1.39 .60 F = 25.44**/η2 = .04 G > B F = .19/η2 = .00

Note. Means and standard deviations are based on raw scores of the variables. However, the ANOVAs were computed using log-transformed values for those variables that required this transformation.

a

Aggression is a composite score derived through latent variable measurement modeling of three manifest variables. Individual scores for the three measures were standardized, multiplied by factor weights observed in the measurement model, and then averaged to create the Aggression composite.

**

p < .01.

*

p<.05.