Table 1.
Parameters | Symbol | Values | |
---|---|---|---|
Cytoplasmic volume | Vc | 230 μm3 | |
Network polymerization | |||
Base network density | θ0 | 10−3 | |
Base network turnover time | τn | 20 s | |
Messenger concentration | m | 0–13 | |
Equilibrium network | θeq = θ0(1 + m) | 10−3 – 1.3 × 10−2 | |
Messenger diffusion coefficient | Dm | 1 μm2 s−1 | |
Messenger decay time | τm | 1 s | |
Messenger penetration depth | 1 μm | ||
Messenger emissivity | εm | 0 – 2 × 10−3 | |
Momentum equation | |||
Specific network viscosity | ν0 | 5 × 10−4 Pa s | |
Disjoining force strength | ψ0nMdMmθn | mθn × 10 mN m−1 | |
Attractive force strength | ψ0nSdSεm | εm × (− 400 mN m−1) | |
Network-solvent drag | H | 160 pN s μm−4 |
Cytoplasmic volume computed from observed volume of spherical keratocytes in suspension (J. Lee, University of Connecticut, private communication, 2008). Parameters related to network concentration, viscosity, and network-solvent drag derived from neutrophil data and modeling (see (12,13), and references therein). Attractive and disjoining force strengths are the minimum values required to drive the correct flattening ratio and the correct velocities.