Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 21;98(8):1408–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4303

Table 1.

Modeling parameters

Parameters Symbol Values
Cytoplasmic volume Vc 230 μm3

Network polymerization

 Base network density θ0 10−3
 Base network turnover time τn 20 s
 Messenger concentration m 0–13
 Equilibrium network θeq = θ0(1 + m) 10−3 – 1.3 × 10−2
 Messenger diffusion coefficient Dm 1 μm2 s−1
 Messenger decay time τm 1 s
 Messenger penetration depth
dm=Dmτm
1 μm
 Messenger emissivity εm 0 – 2 × 10−3

Momentum equation

 Specific network viscosity ν0 5 × 10−4 Pa s
 Disjoining force strength ψ0nMdMn n × 10 mN m−1
 Attractive force strength ψ0nSdSεm εm × (− 400 mN m−1)
 Network-solvent drag H 160 pN s μm−4

Cytoplasmic volume computed from observed volume of spherical keratocytes in suspension (J. Lee, University of Connecticut, private communication, 2008). Parameters related to network concentration, viscosity, and network-solvent drag derived from neutrophil data and modeling (see (12,13), and references therein). Attractive and disjoining force strengths are the minimum values required to drive the correct flattening ratio and the correct velocities.