Table 4.

Associations between baseline characteristics and an increase in knowledge, increase in self-efficacy, and decrease in decisional conflict between pre and post intervention (unadjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs)^*

Characteristics	Increase in knowledge	Increase in self- efficacy	Decrease in decisional conflict
Age
40– 50	1.97 (0.75 – 5.18)	1.09 (0.49 – 2.42)	2.08 (0.96 – 4.51)
Above 50	REF	REF	REF
Marital status
Currently Married	REF	REF	REF
Not married	0.51 (0.20 – 1.32)	1.65 (0.73 – 3.74)	1.27 (0.58 – 2.77)
Income
< $25,000	0.59 (0.20 – 1.77)	2.76 (1.05 –7.27)	2.23 (0.85 – 5.84)
$25,000 to $49,000	1.74 (0.43 – 7.10)	0.52 (0.16 – 1.64)	1.86 (0.69 – 4.98)
$50,000 or more	REF	REF	REF
Education
High school graduate or less	1.23 (0.43 – 3.51)	1.21 (0.52 – 2.83)	1.45 (0.63 – 3.32)
Some college or more	REF	REF	REF
Family history of prostate cancer
Yes	REF	REF	REF
No	2.84 (0.96 – 8.40)	3.42 (0.93– 12.63)	1.46 (0.54 – 3.95)
Ever heard of PSA
Yes	REF	REF	REF
No	2.15 (0.57 – 8.06)	1.74 (0.69 – 4.42)	1.06 (0.42 – 2.63)
Ever heard of DRE
Yes	REF	REF	REF
No	0.79 (0.23 – 2.69)	0.56 (0.17 – 1.85)	1.19 (0.42 – 3.41)
Risk perception
More likely to get prostate cancer	0.28 (0.08 – 0.95)	0.88 (0.28 – 2.78)	0.45 (0.15 – 1.37)
Less likely to get prostate cancer	0.74 (0.24 – 2.26)	0.92 (0.38 – 2.20)	0.57 (0.24 – 1.32)
About as likely to get prostate cancer	REF	REF	REF
Control preferences
Active	1.12 (0.21 –5.88)	0.30 (0.08 – 1.17)	1.45 (0.38 – 5.46)
Collaborative	0.68 (0.12 – 4.00)	0.38 (0.08 – 1.69)	0.86 (0.20 – 3.69)
Passive	REF	REF	REF
Baseline scores
Knowledge score	0.96 (0.93 – 0.99)
Decision self-efficacy score	---	0.92 (0.89 – 0.96)
Decisional conflict score	---		1.12 (1.08 – 1.17)

^*Reference category for knowledge is no change or a reduction in score; for self-efficacy is no change or reduction in scores; and decisional conflict is no change or an increase in score.