Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Sci Law. 2009;27(1):97–117. doi: 10.1002/bsl.836

Table 5.

Regression predicting children’s pre-hearing emotional reaction to attending their hearing and the judge’s decision

Step and predictor ΔR2 Standardized βs

Step 1 Step 2 Step3
Step 1 .03
  Age at study −.03 −.15 −.34*
  Time in system .17 .46** .46**
Step 2 .10**
  Age × time in system −.43** −.51**
Step 3 .14** −.09
  Definition accuracy
  Open-ended story accuracy .45**
  Close-ended story accuracy −.01

Emotional reactions scored on a five-point face scale (1 = very negative and 5 = very positive). Children’s definition accuracy was scored on a three-point scale (0 = not correct, 1 = partially correct, 2 = correct). Children’s open-ended story accuracy and close-ended story accuracy were scored on a two-point scale (0 = not correct, 1 = correct).

*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.