Table 5.
Regression predicting children’s pre-hearing emotional reaction to attending their hearing and the judge’s decision
| Step and predictor | ΔR2 | Standardized βs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step3 | ||
| Step 1 | .03 | |||
| Age at study | −.03 | −.15 | −.34* | |
| Time in system | .17 | .46** | .46** | |
| Step 2 | .10** | |||
| Age × time in system | – | −.43** | −.51** | |
| Step 3 | .14** | – | – | −.09 |
| Definition accuracy | ||||
| Open-ended story accuracy | – | – | .45** | |
| Close-ended story accuracy | – | – | −.01 | |
Emotional reactions scored on a five-point face scale (1 = very negative and 5 = very positive). Children’s definition accuracy was scored on a three-point scale (0 = not correct, 1 = partially correct, 2 = correct). Children’s open-ended story accuracy and close-ended story accuracy were scored on a two-point scale (0 = not correct, 1 = correct).
p < .05;
p < .01.