Table 1.
A Comparison of Human Study Outcomes of Direct Pulp Capping Comparing Calcium Hydroxide to Adhesive Systems
Study | # Teeth | Exposure Type | Restoration | Time | Histo | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accorinte and others, 200684 | 40 | Mechanical | Total-etch/composite | 2 months | Y | CaOH |
De Souza Costa and others, 20014 | 33 | Mechanical | Self-etch/composite | 10 months | Y | CaOH |
Accorinte and others, 20082 | 34 | Mechanical | Self-etch/composite | 3 months | Y | CaOH |
Subay and Demirci, 200585 | 16 | Mechanical | Total-etch/composite | 1 month | Y | CaOH |
Accorinte and others, 20053 | 25 | Mechanical | Total-etch/composite | 2 months | Y | CaOH |
Fernandes and others, 20085 | 46 | Mechanical | Total-etch/composite | 1 month | Y | CaOH |
Hörsted-Bindslev and others, 20066 | 34 | Mechanical | Total-etch/composite | 2 months | Y | CaOH |
Pulp capping material shown in the “Results” column depicts significantly better performance by calcium hydroxide in all cases.
“Histo” refers to whether histological analysis was done as part of outcomes assessment.