Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2009 Aug 27;118(1-3):12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.08.001

Table 2.

Pre and post scores and effect sizes on all measure from intake to post-assessment.

Measures Motivational
Math Game
n=29
M (SD)
Math Game
n=28
M (SD)
Non-trained
Subsample
n=15
M (SD)
ANOVA
Significance
(p-value)
Effect
Size

Intrinsic Motivation
Inventory (0–147)
  Pre 58.60 (17.47) 62.14 (16.83) 57.60 (17.47) .28
  Post 97.32 (8.45) * 72.06 (11.02) 53.64 (14.38) .03 .79

Perceived Competency Scale
(4–28)
  Pre 10.21 (3.02) 11.29 (4.92) 9.03 (3.42) .48
  Post 18.93 (3.89) * 13.02 (3.93) 10.27 (2.64) .04 .60

Treatment Self Regulation
(0–126)
  Pre 22.13 (4.12) 19.20 (5.32) 19.23 (3.64) .28
  Post 23.24 (4.43) 21.97 (4.11) 18.97 (5.10) .12 .14

Arithmetic Test Total Correct
(0–60)
  Pre 31.32 (7.27) 34.92 (6.05) 36.76 (5.87) .21
  Post 52.31 (3.34) ** 44.88 (3.56) * 34.97 (6.29) .04 .73

CPT-IP FP
  Pre 9.95 (3.43) 8.47 (4.38) 7.83 (2.41) .11
  Post 4.01 (1.30) * 5.97 (2.55) 7.25 (4.35) .05 .43

Brief Psychiatric Rating
Scale Total
  Pre 60.02 (17.24) 56.19 (13.39) 58.46 (19.20) .53
  Post 52.84 (13.15) 54.23 (19.58) 57.32 (18.24) .09 −.04

Days to complete 10 sessions 11.10 (2.40) *** 17.12 (3.23) -- t-test p = .04

Note: CPT-IP FP: Continuous Performance Test-Identical Pairs, Number of False Positives

*

Post Hoc: Tukey HSD multiple comparison is significant at p≤.05

**

Post Hoc: Tukey HSD multiple comparison is significant for the Motivation Learning Program vs. Math Game at .03

***

T-test is significant at .04