Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;14(4):402–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.06.010

Table 2.

Association of patients baseline treatment preferences and expectations with change in WOMAC pain score.

Change in WOMAC pain at 6 months
Change in WOMAC pain at 12 months
Unadjusted mean difference (95% CI) Adjusteda mean difference (95% CI) Unadjusted mean difference (95% CI) Adjusteda mean difference (95% CI)
Preference for treatment received
 Yes cf. nob 0.19 (−0.86, 1.25) 0.43 (−0.58, 1.43) 0.23 (−0.95, 1.41) 0.45 (−0.66, 1.56)



Preference for A&E
Strongly prefer/prefer cf. no preferenceb 0.16 (−0.72, 1.04) 0.45 (−0.40, 1.31) −0.25 (−1.24, 0.73) −0.006 (−0.95, 0.94)
Strongly not prefer/not prefer cf. no preferenceb −0.17 (−1.95, 1.61) −0.97 (−2.66, 0.73) 0.21 (−1.91, 2.32) −0.65 (−2.66, 1.35)



Preference for acupuncture
Strongly prefer/prefer cf. no preferenceb 0.44 (−0.43, 1.31) 0.16 (−0.69, 1.02) 0.19 (−0.79, 1.17) −0.19 (−1.14, 0.76)
Strongly not prefer/not prefer cf. no preferenceb −0.91 (−3.29, 1.47) −1.18 (−3.45, 1.10) −1.36 (−4.07, 1.35) −1.65 (−4.21, 0.90)



Match preferences
 Yes cf. nob 0.78 (−0.07, 1.62) 0.52 (−0.40, 1.45) 0.13 (−0.82, 1.08) −0.30 (−1.33, 0.72)



Treatment expectations
High (8–10) cf. low (1–7) general expectationb 0.90 (0.05, 1.75) 0.46 (−0.37, 1.30) 1.22 (0.28, 2.17) 0.68 (−0.24, 1.59)
High (6–10) cf. low (1–5) expectation for A&Eb 0.72 (−0.14, 1.57) 0.54 (−0.28, 1.36) 0.74 (−0.22, 1.70) 0.49 (−0.43, 1.40)
High (6–10) cf. low (1–5) expectation for acupunctureb 1.20 (0.33, 2.07) 0.70 (−0.17, 1.57) 1.30 (0.31, 2.28) 0.64 (−0.34, 1.62)



Matched treatment expectationsc
 Yes cf. nob 1.14 (0.28, 2.01) 0.66 (−0.20, 1.51) 1.34 (0.36, 2.32) 0.71 (−0.25, 1.67)
a

Adjusted for baseline WOMAC pain, age, gender, duration of knee problems, and randomised treatment group.

b

Compared to a change of 0 in the comparison group.

c

Using cut-offs (at median) to define high/low treatment expectations.