Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr;14(4):402–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.06.010

Table 3.

Association of patients baseline treatment preferences and expectations with OMERACT-OARSI responder.

OMERACT-OARSI at 6 months
OMERACT-OARSI at 12 months
Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusteda odds ratio (95% CI) Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusteda odds ratio (95% CI)
Preference for treatment received
Yes cf. nob 1.48 (0.86, 2.55) 1.76 (1.00, 3.10) 0.98 (0.57, 1.70) 1.09 (0.61 1.93)



Preference for A&E
Strongly prefer/prefer cf. no preferenceb 1.09 (0.70, 1.72) 1.20 (0.74, 1.94) 1.17 (0.73, 1.86) 1.19 (0.72, 1.96)
Strongly not prefer/not prefer cf. no preferenceb 0.81 (0.32, 2.03) 0.70 (0.27, 1.82) 0.54 (0.20, 1.44) 0.50 (0.18, 1.41)



Preference for acupuncture
Strongly prefer/prefer cf. no preferenceb 1.14 (0.73, 1.78) 1.21 (0.75, 1.96) 0.86 (0.54, 1.36) 0.91 (0.55, 1.51)
Strongly not prefer/not prefer cf. no preferenceb 0.63 (0.18, 2.26) 0.58 (0.15, 2.24) 0.69 (0.20, 2.38) 0.63 (0.17, 2.38)



Matched preferences
Yes cf. nob 1.42 (0.92, 2.20) 1.33 (0.79, 2.24) 0.91 (0.58, 1.42) 0.82 (0.48, 1.40)



Treatment expectations
High (8–10) cf. low (1–7) general expectation 1.91 (1.23, 2.97) 1.79 (1.12, 2.87) 1.81 (1.15, 2.86) 1.62 (1.00, 2.63)
High (6–10) cf. low (1–5) expectation for A&E 1.66 (1.06, 2.59) 1.57 (0.99, 2.49) 1.72 (1.09, 2.72) 1.59 (0.99, 2.58)
High (6–10) cf. low (1–5) expectation for acupuncture 1.70 (1.07, 2.69) 1.68 (1.03, 2.75) 1.69 (1.05, 2.71) 1.75 (1.04, 2.93)



Matched treatment expectations
Yes cf. noc 1.81 (1.15, 2.87) 1.72 (1.06, 2.79) 1.91 (1.19, 3.06) 1.88 (1.13, 3.13)
a

Adjusted for baseline WOMAC pain, age, gender, duration of knee problems, and randomised treatment group.

b

Compared to an odds ratio of 1 in the comparison group.

c

Using cut-offs (at median) to define high/low treatment expectations.