Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 20.
Published in final edited form as: Partner Abuse. 2010;1(2):131–152. doi: 10.1891/1946-6560.1.2.131

Table 4.

Final Model for Couples’ IPV and Observed Internalizing Negative Affect

Predictor Coefficient SE t, df P
Women’s Satisfaction
Level 1 Effects (Within-Couple)
 IPV −10.06 5.87 −1.71, 528 .09
 Int. Neg. Affect −44.43 24.01 −1.85, 528 .06
 IPV × Int. Neg. Affect −384.73 155.46 −2.48, 528 .01
Level 2 Effects (Between-Couple)
Intercept (DAS at T2)
 Mean IPV −26.74 5.92 −4.52, 107 < .001
 Mean Int. Neg. Affect −85.04 53.69 −1.58, 107 .12
Slope (T1-T3 DAS)
Men’s Satisfaction
Level 1 Effects (Within-Couple)
 IPV −6.70 4.48 −1.50, 528 .14
 Int. Neg. Affect −10.80 25.57 −0.42, 528 .67
 IPV × Int. Neg. Affect −841.79 193.24 −4.36, 528 <.001
Level 2 Effects (Between-Couple)
Intercept (DAS at T2)
Slope (T1-T3 DAS)
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure