Skip to main content
. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1771–1775. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1771

Table 2.

Effect of three types of care for cystic fibrosis on outcome measures* (P value represents any difference between the three groups. Adjusted mean calculated after correction for imbalances of important covariates between groups)

Outcome measure Group A (n=50) Group B (n=47) Group C (n=36) P value
FEV1 (body mass index as covariate):
 Observed mean 60.5 53.1 44.5
 Adjusted mean 53.5 53.9 50.7 0.777
 Pooled within group SD 19.35
FEV1(without body mass index):
 Adjusted mean 61.2 54.3 42.6 0.002
 Pooled within group SD 22.26
Body mass index (with FEV1 as covariate):
 Observed mean 21.3 20.2 18.3
 Adjusted mean 21.2 20.0 18.8 <0.001
 Pooled within group SD 2.02
Body mass index (without FEV1):
 Adjusted mean 21.6 20.0 18.3 <0.001
 Pooled within group SD 2.39
Chest x ray film score:
 Median (interquartile range) 9.0 (6.0-11.0) 10.0 (7.0-12.8) 12.0 (10.0-13.0) 0.003
n=47 n=44 n=33
Age (years) at colonisation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa:
 Observed mean (SD) 11.1 (5.5) 18.1 (7.3) 16.1 (9.5) <0.001
n=41 n=36 n=19

FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in one second as percentage of predicted values. *Group A patients had had both paediatric and adult care in a cystic fibrosis centre; group B patients had not had paediatric but had had adult care in a cystic fibrosis centre; group C patients had had no care in a cystic fibrosis centre. Kruskal-Wallis test. One way analysis of variance.