Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomech. 2010 Feb 12;43(7):1408–1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.057

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Typical sequence of events of rupture test compared to FEA predicted wall stress for Patient 1 Sylgard 160 Model 2. (A) Model is inflected with air, (B) silicone rubber fails (highlighted in figure), (C) tear develops (highlighted in figure) until (D) AAA model completely fails. The model in the centre of each image A–D is the original model, with the reflected views to either side. (E) Shows the numerically predicted wall stress of the same case.