Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2010 Jan 22;105(4):626–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02820.x

Table 4.

HLM Results for AA attendance predicting depression for the Outpatient and Aftercare samples a

Variable b (se) F (df) p
Outpatient Sample
baseline Depression
Lagged AA attendance
Lagged AA attendance X Depression
Lagged AA attendance X time
.4683(.0382)
−.0056(.0109)
−.0002(.0010)
−.0107(.0152)
150.06(113)
0.26(390)
0.04(235)
0.49(387)
<.0001
.6083
.8417
.4838
Aftercare Sample
baseline Depression
Lagged AA attendance
Lagged AA attendance X Depression
Lagged AA attendance X time
.4300(.0402)
.0031(.0110)
−.0010(.0007)
.0156(.0133)
114.28(353)
0.08(197)
11.42(358)
1.90(340)
<.0001
.7763
.1690
.2441
a

Control and other variables included in these tested models but not shown above include age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, employment status, number of prior alcohol treatments, treatment assignment, treatment site, gender X time, concurrent PDA and concurrent DDD.