Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Dermatol. 2010 Feb 15;146(4):388–395. doi: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.374

Table 1.

Distribution of Risk Factors for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas among Cases and Controls

Covariates SCC n = 415 Controls n = 415 p value*

Hair color (% red/blond) 102 (24.6) 67 (16.2) 0.003

Eye color (% blue/grey) 191 (46.1) 165 (40.0) 0.073

Skin type <0.001
 1 58 (14.0) 20 (4.8)
 2 76 (18.3) 40 (9.6)
 3 244 (58.8) 253 (61.0)
 4 36 (8.7) 90 (21.7)
 Missing 1 (0.2) 12 (2.9)

Education (% 4-year college degree or above) 158 (38.1) 176 (42.5) 0.193

Cigarette smoking (% current) 29 (7.0) 16 (3.9) 0.046

Sunburns (% > 2 severe sunburns) 263 (63.5) 184 (44.7) <0.001

Childhood freckles (% yes) 224 (54.5) 111 (27.2) <0.001

Occupational sun exposure§ (% yes) 96 (23.2) 85 (20.6) 0.365

Routine sun exposure (% yes) 312 (75.2) 284 (68.6) 0.035

Average # hrs/week outdoors 10am–4pm 0.009
 1–2 150 (36.2) 161 (38.8)
 3–5 92 (22.2) 113 (27.2)
 6–10 82 (19.8) 71 (17.1)
 >10 91 (21.9) 70 (16.9)

Tanning bed use (% yes) 49 (11.8) 36 (8.7) 0.137

History of actinic keratoses (% yes) 333 (84.1) 80 (19.9) <0.001

Family history of skin cancer^ <0.001
 No 172 (41.6) 315 (75.9)
 Yes 136 (32.9) 59 (14.2)
 Don't Know 106 (25.6) 41 (9.9)
*

Pearson Chi-squared test for proportions

Reaction of skin after exposure to 1 hour of mid-day sun for the first time in the summer with 1=painful or blistering sunburn with no tan, 2=painful sunburn followed by a light tan, 3= mild sunburn followed by a moderate tan, 4= no sunburn followed by a deep tan

§

At least 2 hours/day of sun-exposure between 10am–4 pm for primary occupation

At least 2 hours/day once-a-week of sun-exposure between 10am–4 pm in the past 10 years

Treatment by a doctor for a precancerous skin lesion

^

Including natural parents, brothers, and sisters only

More cases than controls reported not knowing their family history of skin cancer. Examination of the survey did not reveals any issues with survey design that would have caused subjects to skip the question differentially. The reasons for the discrepancy are unknown.