Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropharmacology. 1997 Jul;36(7):941–949. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(97)00074-9

Table 3.

A comparison of electrophysiological data from α1β3γ2 and α6β3γ2 using bath-applied PRO or TCEt, picospritzer-applied GABA (values are pooled means ± SEM, 4 ≤ n ≤ 15)

Anesthetic Cell line EC50 Hill coefficient Maximum (% enhancement)
PRO α1β3γ2 2.6 ± 0.5 μM 1.3 ± 0.2 564 ± 53
α6β 3γ2 4.6 ± 1.9 μM 1.3 ± 0.3 136 ± 17
TCEt α1β3γ2 0.8 ± 0.2 mM 1.0 ± 0.6 258 ± 21
α6β 3γ2 0.6 ± 0.2 mM 1.3 ± 0.3 60 ± 3