Table 3.
Reported outcomes in 17 included randomised controlled trials (listed alphabetically by type of rehabilitation) of inpatient rehabilitation programmes specifically designed for geriatric patients
Reported short term (at discharge) outcomes | Reported longer term (at 3-12 month follow-up) outcomes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Functional improvement (instrument used)* | Nursing home admission | Mortality | Functional improvement (instrument used)* | Nursing home admission | Mortality | Length of follow-up to outcome measurement (months) | |||
General geriatric rehabilitation | |||||||||
Applegate 1990 | No | Yes | No | ADL score | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||
Cohen 2002 | Katz index | No | No | Katz index | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||
Fleming 2004 | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||
Karppi 1995 | No | No | No | Katz index | Yes | Yes | 3 (function), 12 (nursing home admission, mortality) | ||
Rubenstein 1984 | No | Yes | Yes | Personal self maintenance scale | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||
Saltvedt 2002 | No | Yes | Yes | Barthel index | Yes | Yes | 6 (nursing home admission), 12 (function, mortality) | ||
White 1994 | Katz index | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Discharge | ||
Young 2007 | Barthel index† | No | Yes | Barthel index† | Yes | Yes | 6 | ||
Orthopaedic geriatric rehabilitation | |||||||||
Cameron 1993 | No | No | No | Barthel index | Yes | No | 4 | ||
Gilchrist 1988 | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | 6 | ||
Huusko 2002 | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||
Kennie 1988 | Katz index | Yes | Yes | Katz index | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||
Naglie 2002 | No | Yes | Yes | Barthel index | Yes | Yes | 6 | ||
Shyu 2005 | Barthel index | Yes | Yes | Barthel index | Yes | Yes | 3 | ||
Stenvall 2007 | Katz index | Yes | Yes | Katz index | Yes | Yes | 12 | ||
Swanson 1998 | Barthel index | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | 6 | ||
Vidan 2005 | Katz index | No | Yes | Katz index | No | Yes | 3 (function), 12 (mortality) |
ADL=activities of daily living.
*See methods for references of functional status measures.
†Functional status outcomes reported for only one study site (intervention group n=79, control group n=141).