Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Med. 2006 Nov 6;4(1):106–114. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00384.x

Table 5.

Ordinal logistic regression model

N (%) Proportional
odds ratio
estimate
SE Wald d.f. P 95% confidence
interval
Upper Lower
Threshold
“Overall, I am satisfied with the outcomes of my hysterectomy.”
 1 = Completely disagree 19 (9.4) −3.021 0.341 78.409 1 <0.001 −3.689 −2.352
 2 = Somewhat disagree 16 (7.4) −2.345 0.301 60.562 1 <0.001 −2.935 −1.754
 3 = Disagree a little 11 (5.4) −2.005 0.288 48.445 1 <0.001 −2.569 −1.440
 4 = Neither agree nor disagree 6 (3.0) −1.846 0.283 42.573 1 <0.001 −2.401 −1.292
 5 = Agree a little 14 (6.9) −1.559 0.275 32.107 1 <0.001 −2.098 −1.020
 6 = Somewhat agree 49 (24.3) −0.682 0.258 7.002 1 0.008 −1.187 −0.177
 7 = Completely agree 87 (43.1) *
Predictors
 Self-report of any negative sexual outcome 133 (65.2) −1.473 0.271 29.611 1 <0.001 −2.004 −0.943
 Self-report of any positive sexual outcome 88 (43.1) 0.539 0.232 5.392 1 0.020 0.084 0.995
 Discussed any negative sexual outcome with doctor 92 (47.9) 0.655 0.238 7.602 1 0.006 0.189 1.120
 Discussed any positive sexual outcome with doctor 68 (35.1) −0.097 0.268 0.131 1 0.717 −0.623 0.429
*

Threshold parameter estimates refer to the overall likelihood of a response at or below the corresponding category; the estimate for the highest category is not necessary because all cases fall into this or a lower category.

Significantly enhanced the prediction of overall hysterectomy satisfaction rating, P < 0.05.