Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010 Feb 10;393(3):504–508. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.02.035

Table 1. Characterization of Phosphomimetic Ser→Glu Mutants of P16.

Protein IC50
(nM)a
Core Structureb ΔGdwater
(kcal/mol)c
D1/2
(M)c
m
(kcal mol-1 M-1)c
Tm
(°C)d
P16 SSSSe
(WT)
72±15 Retained 2.32 0.72 3.23 46.0
P16 ESSS
(S7E)
140±17 Retained 2.95 0.83 3.49 47.3
P16 SESS
(S8E)
>750f Retained 2.14 0.70 3.05 46.1
P16 SSES
(S140E)
114±21 Retained 2.49 0.79 3.07 41.7
P16 SSSE
(S152E)
45±12 Retained 2.46 0.80 2.95 43.0
P16 AAAA 87±21 Retained 2.82 0.76 3.73 46.3
a

The estimated error in the determination of IC50 is ± 20%, and a 3-fold change in the IC50 values is regarded as biochemically significant [7].

b

Perturbations to the core structure of P16 were investigated as previously described [7, 13].

c

ΔGdwater, D1/2 (the denaturant concentration at the midpoint of transition), and m values were calculated according to a two-state transition model, and the error in ΔGdwater was estimated to be ± 0.5 kcal/mol [9].

d

The error of Tm was estimated to be ± 0.5 °C [9].

e

Data cited from [13].

f

The exact IC50 of P16 S8E was not determined simply because the maximum inhibition of CDK4 was not achieved in the presence of 2.0 μM P16 S8E, the highest concentration used in our assay.