Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 11;33(5):969–976. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1974

Table 1.

Macronutrient composition of the treatment groups

CON HP CON+RT HP+RT Treatment group* Diet
n 16 12 17 14
Energy (kJ) 6,278 ± 648 6,321 ± 763 6,199 ± 696 6,339 ± 649 0.944 0.62
Carbohydrate (g) 197.4 ± 16.3 176.3 ± 23.7 195.0 ± 21.5 170.0 ± 23.1 0.001 <0.001
Carbohydrate (% of energy) 53.6 ± 2.6 47.4 ± 1.6 53.6 ± 3.9 45.5 ± 2.4 <0.001 <0.001
Protein (g) 68.4 ± 5.9 119.0 ± 7.8 68.0 ± 8.3 117.1 ± 6.7 <0.001 <0.001
Protein (% of energy) 18.6 ± 0.9 32.3 ± 2.8 18.7 ± 1.3 31.6 ± 2.2 <0.001 <0.001
Fat (g) 38.5 ± 7.7 30.5 ± 8.2 37.5 ± 9.6 33.7 ± 5.5 0.041 <0.01
Fat (% of energy) 22.6 ± 3.0 17.7 ± 3.0 22.3 ± 4.5 19.6 ± 1.9 0.001 <0.001
Saturated fat (% of total fat) 34.1 ± 5.5 33.9 ± 5.0 33.2 ± 2.8 34.3 ± 4.3 0.90 0.68
Polyunsaturated fat (% of total fat) 19.8 ± 4.5 22.3 ± 3.6 21.4 ± 4.5 21.0 ± 4.2 0.47 0.39
Monounsaturated fat (% of total fat) 46.1 ± 6.6 43.9 ± 4.1 45.5 ± 5.4 44.8 ± 5.1 0.74 0.32
Diet fiber (g) 31.1 ± 2.9 24.7 ± 4.0 30.5 ± 4.4 22.6 ± 4.1 <0.001 <0.001

Data are means ± SD. The treatment groups were a standard carbohydrate, low-protein, low-fat diet alone (CON) or with resistance exercise training (CON+RT), or an isocaloric higher-protein, low-fat diet alone (HP) or with resistance exercise training (HP+RT).

*Differences between groups (one-way ANOVA).

†Comparison of the difference between the diets (CON and CON+RT vs. HP and HP+RT) (planned contrast).