Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 21.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Nov 10;14(1):103–111. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi010

Figure 4.

Figure 4

ERG waveforms from a 6-month-old Cdh23v-2J +/+ Pcdh15av-3J double heterozygous mutant (A and B) and from an aged-matched +/Pcdh15av-3J single heterozygote control (C and D). The amplitude and implicit time of both the rod- and cone-mediated ERG are normal. Rod-dominated responses were recorded to short-wavelength (λmax = 470 nm; Wratten 47A filter) flashes of light over a 4.0 log unit range of intensities (0.3 log unit steps) up to the maximum allowable by the photic stimulator. Cone-dominated responses were obtained with white flashes (0.3 steps) on the rod-saturating background after 10 min of exposure to the background light to allow complete light adaptation. Signals were sample every 0.8 ms over a response window of 200 ms. For each stimulus condition, responses were computer-averaged with up to 50 records averaged for the weakest signals.