Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Apr 7;87(5):572–578. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.13

Table 3.

Pharmacogenetic Refinement Model in Derivation Cohort (N=969).

Entry into model variable Effect on dose* (95% CI) Cumulative Model R2 P
1 VKORC1-1639 G>A -20% (-23% to -17%) 23.2% <0.001
2 ln(INR) -12% (-14% to -11%) 35.5% <0.001
3 Dose-3, per mg +2% (1% to 3%) 44.1% <0.001
4 Age, per year -7% (-9% to -6%) 49.9% <0.001
5 CYP2C9*3 -28% (-32% to -23%) 55.1% <0.001
6 CYP2C9*2 -15% (-19% to -11%) 57.0% <0.001
7 BSA, per 0.25 m2 +7% (4% to 9%) 58.9% <0.001
8 Target INR +7% (4% to 10%) 59.7% <0.001
9 African Origin -11% (-17% to -5%) 60.4% 0.001
10 Stroke -23% (-33% to -10%) 61.0% <0.001
11 Dose-4, per mg +1% (1% to 2%) 61.5% <0.001
12 Dose-2, per mg +2% (1% to 3%) 62.0% <0.001
13 Diabetes -9% (-16% to -3%) 62.3% 0.007
14 Amiodarone Use -12% (-21% to -1%) 62.5% 0.028
15 Fluvastatin Use -17% (-33% to 4%) 62.6% 0.106
*

Effect on the estimate of the maintenance dose is calculated per variant allele, and per 0.25 unit increase in ln(INR) or target INR.

ln is natural logarithm. INR is International normalized ratio.

Dose −i is dose given i days before INR is measured.

BSA is Body Surface Area.