Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 14;21(6):685–691. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-1084-6

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Correlation between MUCP with UPP technique and USS technique. There is a high correlation of 0.86 between the two techniques (p < 0.001). Based on this equation, 74% of the variability can be explained by this model (n = 25). MUCP maximum urethral closure pressure, UPP urethral pressure profilometry, USS urethral sleeve sensor