Table II.
Descriptive Statistics, Internal Consistency Reliability, and Item Discrimination for Internalized Stigma Subscales and Overall Scale
Domain / Subscale |
No. of Items |
Mean Scorea |
Median Scorea |
SD | Skewness of Scaleb |
% Scoring Minimum |
% Scoring Maximum |
Internal Consistencyc |
Item Discriminationd |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stereotypes | 12 | 48 | 45 | 21 | 0.26 | 0.5 | 2 | 0.91 | 100 |
Disclosure concerns |
5 | 32 | 30 | 27 | 0.76 | 16 | 3 | 0.85 | 80 |
Social Relationships |
7 | 29 | 21 | 24 | 0.82 | 13 | 1 | 0.89 | 72 |
Self- acceptance |
4 | 54 | 56 | 25 | −0.03 | 2 | 7 | 0.66 | 75 |
Overall scale |
28 | 41 | 40 | 19 | 0.61 | 0 | 1 | 0.93 | Not applicable |
Possible range 0–100, with higher scores indicative of greater perceived and experienced stigma
Unbounded
Cronbach’s coefficient α
Percentage of time that items in the scale correlated at least two standard errors higher with the hypothesized scale compared with other scales, correcting for item overlap with scale score