Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Nov 2;37(1):11–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02017.x

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics for samples used in the different steps of instrument evaluation

Item analysis
(109 subjects, 889 observations)
Test-retest reliability
(55 subjects, 110 observations)

Pain location Characteristic Mean (SD*) Item–total correlation ICC+ Mean (SD*)
Frequency 11.7 (9.2) 0.79 0.34 7.3 (8.5)
Duration 11.4 (9.2) 0.79 0.39 6.9 (8.2)
Masseter pain Intensity 7.9 (6.8) 0.85 0.32 5.3 (6.6)
Unpleasantness 7.8 (7.1) 0.86 0.31 5.1 (7.1)
Endurability 6.3 (6.5) 0.83 0.30 4.3 (6.7)

Frequency 13.5 (9.0) 0.75 0.34 8.8 (9.2)
Duration 12.7 (9.1) 0.74 0.38 8.5 (9.0)
TMJ pain Intensity 9.2 (7.1) 0.84 0.29 6.8 (7.5)
Unpleasantness 9.0 (7.4) 0.86 0.29 6.3 (7.5)
Endurability 7.1 (6.8) 0.85 0.28 5.0 (7.0)

Frequency 8.7 (8.0) 0.75 0.51 5.4 (7.0)
Duration 9.1 (8.3) 0.72 0.49 5.6 (6.7)
Temple pain Intensity 7.0 (6.8) 0.76 0.51 4.9 (6.4)
Unpleasantness 7.0 (7.0) 0.76 0.52 4.9 (6.5)
Endurability 5.8 (6.3) 0.76 0.51 3.0 (4.9)

Total SSI score 124.4 (94.2) 86.6 (83.2)

Possible range is from 0 to 27 for each scale

*

SD – standard deviation

+

ICC - Intraclass correlation coefficient

Note: means and SD calculated across all 889 observations