Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2010 Jun;11(2):185–196. doi: 10.1007/s11121-009-0154-9

Table 2.

Latent class membership probabilities and conditional item-response probabilities of latent class membership

Conditional item-response probabilities of adequate protectiona

Inadequate Protection Adequate External Adequate Protection w/Low Adult Communication Adequate Protection w/Risky Friends Adequate Protection
Latent class membership probabilities 11% 10% 17% 9% 54%
Internal protective factors
 Life satisfaction 0.29b 0.49c 0.62d 0.81d 0.93d
 Planful competence 0.53c 0.55c 0.77d 0.88d 0.86d
 Physical activity 0.56c 0.53c 0.71d 0.82d 0.82d
 Positive school orientation 0.19b 0.39b 0.83d 0.65d 0.94d
External protective factors
 Parents’ monitoring/limit-setting 0.43c 0.62d 0.63d 0.67d 0.89d
 Parent–child communication 0.16b 1.00d 0.31b 0.71d 0.95d
 Low friends’ ATOD use 0.42c 0.61d 0.86d 0.25b 0.90d
 Other adult communication 0.44c 0.86d 0.44c 0.94d 0.89d
a

Item-response probabilities indicate a response of adequate protection (i.e., received a score of “2” for the indicator)

b

Low (<0.40) strength of the probability

c

Moderate (0.40–0.60) strength of the probability

d

High (>0.60) strength of the probability