Table 3. Multivariate linear models testing the independent relationship between CCS, as dependent variable, and adiposity measures according to diabetes status.
Unadjusted | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||
β (SE) | p | β (SE) | p | β (SE) | p | |
DM | ||||||
BMI (kg/m2) | −0.021 (0.023) | 0.349 | −0.021 (0.022) | 0.386 | −0.020 (0.021) | 0.394 |
WHR * | −2.741 (1.001) | 0.014 | −2.264 (0.955) | 0.042 | −2.358 (1.065) | 0.050 |
WC * (cm) | −0.018 (0.007) | 0.009 | −0.020 (0.010) | 0.020 | −0.019 (0.010) | 0.029 |
Total fat mass | ||||||
Tertile 1 | Ref | - | Ref | - | Ref | - |
Tertile 2 | −1.771 (1.410) | 0.222 | −0.858 (0.571) | 0.370 | −0.668 (0.546) | 0.532 |
Tertile 3 | −1.237 (0.329) | 0.001 | −1.085 (0.295) | 0.002 | −0.887 (0.279) | 0.004 |
Model 1 included the following confounders: age, gender, yrs of education, physical activity, depression.
Model 2 = Model 1 + BMI, hypertension, smoking IMT, Hb1Ac, CV-PPG, IL-6, Drug vs. diet §.
see methods.
*WHR and WC were entered separately in models.