Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009 Oct 7;52(2):e35–e41. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03474.x

Table III.

Overall error of predicted percentage body fat: original and corrected Slaughter equations

Difference (predicted percentage body fat-DXA percentage body fat)a
Original Slaughter equations
CP corrected Slaughter equations
Mean (SD)b 95% CI Mean (SD)b 95% CI
Overall −9.6 (6.2) (−11.0 to −8.1) 0.2 (4.8) (−1.0 to 1.3)
Sex
 Male −8.0 (5.9) (−9.8 to −6.1) −0.1 (4.4) (−1.5 to 1.3)
 Female −11.8 (6.0) (−14.0 to −9.5) 0.5 (5.3) (−1.5 to 2.5)
Race
 White −10.1 (6.5) (−11.9 to −8.2) 0.1 (5.1) (−1.3 to 1.5)
 Black −8.3 (5.2) (−10.8 to −5.8) 0.3 (3.9) (−1.6 to 2.2)
GMFCS category
 Less severe −5.7 (5.4) (−8.4 to −3.0) −0.1 (5.1) (−2.6 to 2.5)
 More severe −10.9 (5.9) (−12.5 to −9.3) 0.2 (4.8) (−1.1 to 1.6)
Tanner stage
 1, 2 (Prepubescent) −10.8 (7.3) (−14.3 to −7.2) −0.0 (5.4) (−2.6 to 2.6)
 3 (Pubescent) −11.6 (7.2) (−16.2 to −7.0) −0.0 (5.7) (−3.6 to 3.6)
 4, 5 (Postpubescent) −7.9 (5.3) (−9.7 to −6.0) −0.1 (4.4) (−1.6 to 1.5)
Triceps+subscapular skinfold
 ≤35mm −10.2 (6.2) (−11.8 to −8.5) 0.3 (4.6) (−0.9 to 1.5)
 >35mm −7.3 (5.9) (−10.5 to −4.1) −0.3 (5.5) (−3.4 to 2.7)
a

Individual difference between equation-predicted percentage body fat and DXA percentage body fat.

b

The mean difference provides an estimate of the bias (systematic error) of the equation-predicted percentage body fat, whereas the SD of this difference provides a measure of the precision of the prediction. DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; GMFCS, Gross Motor Function Classification System.