Table 1.
Binding sites detection with a structural similarity mapping method, evolutionary conservation mapping method and an energy-based method on a set of 39 proteins
Method | Total no. of residues | Interface no. residues | No. of predicted residues | P-value (× 10−3) | SP (%) | SE (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ProBiSa | 224 | 54 | 62.8 | 1.4 | 39.0 | 43.9 |
ConSurfb | 224 | 54 | 60.6 | 33.0 | 34.3 | 38.1 |
Q-SiteFinder | 224 | 54 | 48.5 | 6.5 | 39.4 | 38.2 |
Tables with detailed results are available in the Supplementary Material.
aThe alignment scores listed in the ‘Methods’ section were used.
bConSurf uses different methods to count conserved residues. We used the Bayesian method which is enabled by default and gives the best results.