Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics. 2009 May;9(9):2468–2483. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800613

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Apolipoprotein E in LDL. (Left) The 2-DE analysis (n = 5) revealed a significant increase in apolipoprotein E in LDL with exercise treatment compared to control and diabetic dyslipidemic groups (C and DD). The F-ratio was highest in the 2-DE experiment. (Middle) LFQMS analysis (n = 4) confirmed the significant increase in apolipoprotein E in exercised pigs compared to C and DD groups. (Right) SRM (n = 4) revealed no significant alterations in apolipoprotein E abundance with any treatment groups, although the expression profile resembled that in 2-DE and LFQMS. * Denotes a significant difference compared to control animals; †denotes a significant difference compared to diabetic dyslipidemic animals (p ≤0.05).