Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics. 2009 May;9(9):2468–2483. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800613

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Apolipoprotein A-I in LDL. (Left) The 2-DE analysis (n = 5) revealed a significant increase in apolipoprotein A-I in LDL with exercise treatment compared to all other treatment groups (C, H, and DD). The F-ratio was highest in the 2-DE experiment. (Middle) LFQMS analysis (n = 4) confirmed the significant increase in apolipoprotein A-I in exercised pigs compared to C and DD groups, but not compared to H. (Right) SRM (n = 4) confirmed the significant increase in apolipoprotein A-I in exercised pigs compared to all treatment groups (C, H, and DD). The expression profiles were similar with all three methods used. * Denotes a significant difference compared to control (C) animals; # denotes a significant difference from hyperlipidemic (H) animals; †denotes a significant difference compared to diabetic dyslipidemic (DD) animals (p ≤0.01).