Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 26.
Published in final edited form as: Proteomics. 2009 May;9(9):2468–2483. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800613

Table 1.

Differentially expressed protein spots detected by 2-DE and identified by LC-MS/MS

Swiss-Prot entry Protein name TPP confidence Number of peptides Number of spots Theoretical MW (kDa) Theoretical pI Percent coverage
P18648 Apolipoprotein A-I precursor [Sus scrofa] 1.0000 24 3 30 5.5 46.4
P27917 Apolipoprotein C-III precursor [Sus scrofa] 1.0000 3 1 10 4.8 19.8
P18650 Apolipoprotein E precursor [Sus scrofa] 1.0000 16 4 37 5.6 21.5
Q28936 Fibrinogen A-alpha-chain (Fragment) [Sus scrofa] 1.0000 22 13 47 6.6 30.1
P14477 Fibrinogen beta chain (Fragment) [Sus scrofa] 0.9999 2 2 2.2 4.3 68.4
Q6R6M8 Fibrinogen gamma polypeptide (Fragment) [Sus scrofa] 1.0000 7 9 10 4.4 45.7
P01846 Ig lambda chain C region 1.0000 7 5 11 6.8 59

Significant differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, proteins identified by SEQUEST and validated using the transproteomic pipeline (TPP) via PeptideProphet and ProteinProphet; listed from the left are the Swiss-Prot primary accession number, the protein name, percent confidence, the highest number of peptides sequenced of all the protein spots identified as that particular protein, the number of spots identified as that particular protein, the theoretical MW of that Swiss-Prot protein, the theoretical pI of that Swiss-Prot protein, and the percent of the protein’s sequence that was covered when the number of peptides were as indicated.